My thoughts

YO zigglet. You did nothing for this site but critizize me and iec. You called me the as i recal the "Cancer of WFB" and o yea the "reason the site is failing is because of you" I was banned for a GAY reason, and then u left. Hrm..........

Link3618 wrote:

for a GAY reason

Harsh man. A few of my friends are gay.

Link3618 wrote:

Hrm..........

lol What's that supposed to mean?

QWERTYkid911 wrote:

Link3618 wrote:

for a GAY reason

Harsh man. A few of my friends are gay.

Link3618 wrote:

Hrm..........

lol What's that supposed to mean?

I have a thing against gays, anywho...........zigglet comes back and thinks hes like automaticly "good" or ok

When he's been such a fag to me.

Link3618 wrote:

I have a thing against gays

sig'd

QWERTYkid911 wrote:

Link3618 wrote:

I have a thing against gays

sig'd

Its just so queer to kiss a guy, iv been to San Fransisco, IT SUCKS>

did u know 9 cities are gayer than san fran, just they are not heard of
san fran has 2.7% gay couples
some town in florida with 15,000 people has 5.4% gay couples... creepy and way more than the 2nd place

Link3618 wrote:

Its just so queer to kiss a guy

That's what queer is. That's like saying, "It's so dumb to be stupid!"

First of all, one of the people I look up to the most happens to be a "fag", so I'd rather you don't try to use it as an insult.

Secondly, I wouldn't talk about being me being a jerk to you since, in the words of a two year old, you started it.
And I believe it was Robbie who said you were the cancer of WFB.
Also, I don't claim to be "good" or anything of the such. All I did was point out the fact that you and iec were the reasons why I left.

link, just settle down

Zigglett wrote:

First of all, one of the people I look up to the most happens to be a "fag", so I'd rather you don't try to use it as an insult.

Secondly, I wouldn't talk about being me being a jerk to you since, in the words of a two year old, you started it.
And I believe it was Robbie who said you were the cancer of WFB.
Also, I don't claim to be "good" or anything of the such. All I did was point out the fact that you and iec were the reasons why I left.

You cant change my beliefs. God says ACTING on a gay move (action) is bad and a sin. So im wit god on this one.

Ok, good. Then you have nothing against gays. The Catholic Church is only against gays acts. Being gay is fine.

I beg to differ.

Lord Revan67 wrote:

I beg to differ.

Well, that's also fine. I respect your views. I'm just merely stating the official views of the Catholic Church.

Acting, can be as simple as a hug or kiss to your gay friend.

Do not get me wrong, qwerty. I am not against gays. What is done is done. I merely wish for the ideas of being gay not taught to children. I believe that small children are not ready to be told to children, but should only be the will of the mother and father to indoctrinate and control what and when children are revealed to marriage. Respectfully, I am open to your well put opinion and idea.




BTW, thx for sigging me, lol.

Lord Revan67 wrote:

Do not get me wrong, qwerty. I am not against gays. What is done is done. I merely wish for the ideas of being gay not taught to children. I believe that small children are not ready to be told to children, but should only be the will of the mother and father to indoctrinate and control what and when children are revealed to marriage. Respectfully, I am open to your well put opinion and idea.




BTW, thx for sigging me, lol.

indeed. Even if some kids schools dont techa it. It will seem to them. O this other kid from this school says its ok and hes a 3rd GRADER!!!!! (so they asume theres nothing wrong with it. If you are christion/chathlic you should be against gays.

Catholics aren't against gays, they just don't want them to disrespect their body by doing those "gay things".

QWERTYkid911 wrote:

Catholics aren't against gays, they just don't want them to disrespect their body by doing those "gay things".

Do u have a problem IS IT BURNING U INSIDE that i have a DEEP dislike to gay people?

stay on topic

Zigglett wrote:

Anyway, whoever that was that said chatspeak is New English -falcon punches to the face-. The level of readability on this forum is terrible. I'd give a dollar for every person other than TJ and I that used passable grammar, and punctuation.

It was me who said this. I got an A1 in the Higher Level English paper for my Leaving Cert (I beleive it would be the equivalent to the SATs in America even though I'm not sure if there are multiple exams for the SATs). I'm just saying that I know how to use "proper" English.

Now on to my point. Chatspeak in this country, UK, Mainland Europe and even America, has increasingly been used in the top level exams and a lot of examiners are getting worried that so many people (Teenagers) are using it. That's why I refer to it as the 'New English' as do many other Lecturers and I use it often to make my E-Mails/Texts/Posts more compact.

Onto the "Gay" issue. I don't think it's right if two men or women start meeting (making out) in public, but I also don't think it's right that the Church will not allow a gay person family access to their partner if he/she are in hospital. For a Heterosexual couple the opposite happens.