The terms in which link is banned

Link will be banned under these terms:

-Flamming another member
-Flaming the boards
-Causing a conflict between a member
-Causing members to flee

-Has been banned on previous occasions.

I herby ban link3618 for making members leave.

If anyone has a problem pm me...

how long is this ban??
is he banned from chatbox?

LPA this isnt alright. You can't just ban him. He isnt causing members to flee, thats ridiculous. I went to Shadow stars to see what was happening. And I saw some people there. People I know. People that should be here. Slayer and Link obviously have a problem they need to settle out. The ruling you have made was not the best it could have been. Slayer is gone. Im convinced hes not coming back. He did everything and anything Link had done, but he chose what he was going to do. He went to Shadow Stars. Thats one guy happy. But Link, on the other hand, is banned? For flaming? For causing conflicts? That doesn't deserve a ban, it deserves mediation. Especially one of our original members that has been here since the site has started. He didn't earn himself a ban. We shouldn't do that to ourselves. LPA, please fix this.

Well basically Link did try to defend wfb from somthing that wasn't even attacking it. I think he was getting mad since slayer was leaving he thought wfb was gonnna die so he tried to get Lycan banned, thinking he would save wfb. but he ended up making it worse and kinda destroying it even more.

I think he kinda does deserve a ban, I know he was trying to defend wfb, but that was a little to much on what he did, i say give him a ban but not for like ever but maybe a month or two.

No. We would have lost Slayer eventually. With or without Lycan, the people that left were thinking about their decision for a while. They would have left anyways. Links anger towards Slayer had no direct affect on other members, or at least shouldn't.

Lord Revan67 wrote:

No. We would have lost Slayer eventually. With or without Lycan, the people that left were thinking about their decision for a while. They would have left anyways. Links anger towards Slayer had no direct affect on other members, or at least shouldn't.

You did read the Introductions of wfb people on there right?

Edit: Especally Signals Intro

hai

Yes its true

I think Link learned an important lesson this time. Not to get involved in other people's business.

Ok guys i thnk i know slayer a lot from playing months of games with him.... he is a clan hopper, he goes for excitement, wfb isnt the most exciting place, but i like it. I respectd his dissision, i just wanted him to slap me in the face before he left. If i get banned for flaming and causing members to flee then 3 of us (wont say names) should be banned also....... But i feel if lycan never posted that new years thing slayer and the ohers woulden have gone to SHS.

Quote :

Ok guys i thnk i know slayer a lot from playing months of games with him.... he is a clan hopper, he goes for excitement, wfb isnt the most exciting place, but i like it. I respectd his dissision, i just wanted him to slap me in the face before he left. If i get banned for flaming and causing members to flee then 3 of us (wont say names) should be banned also....... But i feel if lycan never posted that new years thing slayer and the ohers woulden have gone to SHS.

OK this is all wrong, like slayer has said, and like i have said, and like his profile on SHS's forum proves: He has been a member of SHS for at least 2 months, it was not the new years party that made him leave, he stated his reasons for leaving in his topic... which i assume you never read just like you didnt read us saying he'd been there for 2 months several times. Everyone else leaving was either a result of them wanting to keep in touch with slayer, or because of a certain someone misinturpreting the situation and causing a lot of WFB members to become pissed off.

this means...
SLAYER IS BACK

Slayer9498 wrote:

this means...
SLAYER IS BACK

and you could have prevented everything if you just said that a week ago

koluigi wrote:

Slayer9498 wrote:

this means...
SLAYER IS BACK

and you could have prevented everything if you just said that a week ago

no.....
how the hell would that happen

Slayer9498 wrote:

koluigi wrote:

Slayer9498 wrote:

this means...
SLAYER IS BACK

and you could have prevented everything if you just said that a week ago

no.....
how the hell would that happen

could have said you were just going on two sites.that would be fine with me

koluigi wrote:

Slayer9498 wrote:

koluigi wrote:

Slayer9498 wrote:

this means...
SLAYER IS BACK

and you could have prevented everything if you just said that a week ago

no.....
how the hell would that happen

could have said you were just going on two sites.that would be fine with me

that WASNT going to happen....
but now link is gone
so it IS

lets prevent another argument, everyone go back to your corners and cut yourselfs peaccefully

Ya, LinkRules did say he didn't want to see any more of these topics (not the original post, but the whole people leaving issue). Time for the Admins to be listened to.