Welcome to The HUB! (formerly Wi-Fi Battlefield)
  • Post new topic
  • Reply to topic

Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Share

Linkrules08
Chuck Norris's Son
Chuck Norris's Son

Number of posts: 3172
Age: 15
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Wii FC: 6832-1748-1366-9350
XBL Gamertag: iponemidgets42
Brawl FC: 3050-7260-4784
Epicness: 31
Registration date: 2008-01-27

Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Linkrules08 on Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:04 pm

Review CoD:WaW here.

Categories:

1.Graphics: How good are the Graphics, Be sure to consider all parts of the game

2.Presentation (Sound, Controls, and Online): How good do the menus look, and how good does the sound (Music and sound effects) and Controls immerse you in the game. How was the Online mode?

3.Gameplay: Is the game fun to play? Too Short? Too Easy?

4.Replayability: Is the game worth playing over and over again?

On a scale of 1-10 and average your score out

Last edited by Linkrules08 on Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:32 pm; edited 4 times in total


____________________________




Slayer9498
Slayerterrific

Number of posts: 3054
Age: 15
Location: Kincheloe MI
XBL Gamertag: ww2axiis
PSN Username: ww2axis
Brawl FC: 017332560697
Epicness: 21
Registration date: 2008-08-01

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Slayer9498 on Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:36 pm

Graphics-
They are wonderful, a nice improvement over the average cod4 graphics, they fixed my main problem, the death animations, by creating many new ones. The effects like, new blood squirts, and the gore, adds a creepy sense of realism. They have also made realistic water affects, and the Japanese really do have great camouflage, especially while hiding in trees. My only problem is the feature of creating holes in cover that they promised, is not included, although you still have bullet penetration.

9.5/10




Presentation-
If you have a pet peave with menus, then you will be glad with this, they are easy to navigate, and are nearly identical to cod4. The controls are the exact same as cod4, so they are still wonderful, and it has a few extra control schemes for those picky people, but you cant make your own controls. The online has its up and downs, but is still great. The maps now are much larger than call of duty 4. Everything from call of duty 4 has been implemented in here, bazookas for rpgs, bouncing bettys for claymores, and the list goes on. The tanks are fun for a while, but get old, but are, gladly, not overpowering, and only in a couple maps. the 2 new game modes are awesome. War has 5 objectives across the map, and it acts like a tug-of-war between sides. Capture the Flag is just like any other ctf, get the enemy's flag and bring it back to yours, but is addicting due to the fun of call of duty. am a little upset over the loss of team tactical, and cage matches, and no old school is a disappointment, those were fun when you were getting bored in cod4. The dogs are also a lot more deadly than helicopters, but slightly annoying. I will update on the Zombie Mode soon.

9.5/10




Gameplay-
The gameplay is a lot alike call of duty 4, and returns the fun. The campaign mode, although i haven't finished it yet, so far is a gripping experience, with lots of emotion, and so far not repetitive. The Japanese so far have been vicious and bloodthirsty, and brings you in fear waiting for the next booby trap or ambush. You play in two campaigns, just like call of duty tradition. You play one on the Japanese front as an American, and the other as a Russian pushing the German's back to Berlin. It is one of the hardest games I have ever played, when played on Veteran, the game's equivalent of EXTREMELY hard. The flamethrower is fun to use, and a good way of getting out of a tough spot of trouble.

10/10




Replayability-
The game seems like it will be fun to replay the campaign, especially if you tried on an easier difficulty first, it is a great challenge. The online will just keep you coming back for more and more, and i think it will last at least 2 years. The only thing that could kill it is maybe a new Call of Duty game, but maybe not even that. My only gripe is that some parts of the campaign, if played on Veteran, are just frustrating, due to the extreme difficulty.

9.5/10





OVERALL RATING
9.7/10

please comment on review, all written by hand, w/o going back to game to think
approximate time to write--- 45 minutes


____________________________
IN WFB HALL OF FAME!!


DONT DISRESPECT ADMINS OR ELSE THIS

Link3618
Prestigeouse

Number of posts: 8412
Age: 14
Location: LA,California
PSN Username: Keith3618
Epicness: 1
Registration date: 2008-02-13

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Link3618 on Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:35 pm

Graphics: 10 cuz i said so
Presintation: 0 cuz it obiouse
Gameplay: 10............
Replayability: Who buys this game if they dont have online Razz


____________________________

Slayer9498
Slayerterrific

Number of posts: 3054
Age: 15
Location: Kincheloe MI
XBL Gamertag: ww2axiis
PSN Username: ww2axis
Brawl FC: 017332560697
Epicness: 21
Registration date: 2008-08-01

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Slayer9498 on Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:37 pm

my review just raped links in the asshole Razz


____________________________
IN WFB HALL OF FAME!!


DONT DISRESPECT ADMINS OR ELSE THIS

Link3618
Prestigeouse

Number of posts: 8412
Age: 14
Location: LA,California
PSN Username: Keith3618
Epicness: 1
Registration date: 2008-02-13

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Link3618 on Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:39 pm

Slayer9498 wrote:my review just raped links in the asshole Razz


Know mine is easier to read i lost yours after the fist para. Plus mine is so true Laughing


____________________________

SmashHero24
Smashasaurus Rex

Number of posts: 4444
Age: 15
Location: South Jersey, USA
Epicness: 1
Registration date: 2008-02-02

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  SmashHero24 on Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:36 am

Slayer9498 wrote:my review just raped links in the asshole Razz

Yeah, but My SSBB review is still far better. Grammar FTW!

Plus, I have tenure at this place.

Bitch.


____________________________
Thanks for stopping by. You're alright.

Slayer9498
Slayerterrific

Number of posts: 3054
Age: 15
Location: Kincheloe MI
XBL Gamertag: ww2axiis
PSN Username: ww2axis
Brawl FC: 017332560697
Epicness: 21
Registration date: 2008-08-01

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Slayer9498 on Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:39 pm

i'll go read it, and see how good it is Suspect


____________________________
IN WFB HALL OF FAME!!


DONT DISRESPECT ADMINS OR ELSE THIS

Aston_Martin_DB9
Next-Gen
Next-Gen

Number of posts: 1812
Age: 21
Location: Ireland
PSN Username: Aston_Martin_DB9
Epicness: 16
Registration date: 2008-10-23

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Aston_Martin_DB9 on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:58 pm

Great review Slayer, everything you said was true. Link... I think you should apply for the Guinness Book Of World Records (shortest review ever made Cheer


____________________________

Link3618
Prestigeouse

Number of posts: 8412
Age: 14
Location: LA,California
PSN Username: Keith3618
Epicness: 1
Registration date: 2008-02-13

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Link3618 on Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:30 pm

ggg thanks o im blushing Embarassed


____________________________

Lord Revan67
007
007

Number of posts: 1170
Age: 14
Location: Valley, CA
XBL Gamertag: Lord Revan67
Epicness: 6
Registration date: 2008-08-29

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Lord Revan67 on Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:27 am

Yo Link, wat up with da presentation bein zero, dawg? That ain't cool, homeslice. Slaya, your review was da schizzel.

Link3618
Prestigeouse

Number of posts: 8412
Age: 14
Location: LA,California
PSN Username: Keith3618
Epicness: 1
Registration date: 2008-02-13

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Link3618 on Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:30 pm

Lord Revan67 wrote:Yo Link, wat up with da presentation bein zero, dawg? That ain't cool, homeslice. Slaya, your review was da schizzel.


my review is the truth. No one reads these reviews. I think in my mind why ddo i need to know what people think of a gme when its overall good, and i dont give a shit what they say. I read 5 sentences of slayers than left.

COD5 Review

Graphics good
Gameplay good
Online good

Correct me if im wrong


____________________________

Lord Revan67
007
007

Number of posts: 1170
Age: 14
Location: Valley, CA
XBL Gamertag: Lord Revan67
Epicness: 6
Registration date: 2008-08-29

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Lord Revan67 on Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:15 pm

Why in the world would presentation be zero for obvious reasons???

Aston_Martin_DB9
Next-Gen
Next-Gen

Number of posts: 1812
Age: 21
Location: Ireland
PSN Username: Aston_Martin_DB9
Epicness: 16
Registration date: 2008-10-23

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Aston_Martin_DB9 on Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:55 pm

Link3618 wrote:
Lord Revan67 wrote:Yo Link, wat up with da presentation bein zero, dawg? That ain't cool, homeslice. Slaya, your review was da schizzel.


my review is the truth. No one reads these reviews. I think in my mind why ddo i need to know what people think of a gme when its overall good, and i dont give a shit what they say. I read 5 sentences of slayers than left.

COD5 Review

Graphics good
Gameplay good
Online good

Correct me if im wrong


I agree that it is easier to read when it's short and sweet, but not many will just take your word for it that it's good. You have to convince them that you're right. (I work as a car salesman)


____________________________

Aston_Martin_DB9
Next-Gen
Next-Gen

Number of posts: 1812
Age: 21
Location: Ireland
PSN Username: Aston_Martin_DB9
Epicness: 16
Registration date: 2008-10-23

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Aston_Martin_DB9 on Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:43 pm

Review CoD:WaW here.

Categories:

1.Graphics - 9/10. Massive step up from the last game. There is so much detail in the graphics now. However I don't find the graphics online as smooth as COD4, therefore it looses a point.

2.Presentation - 10/10. Nothing to complain about. The controls are so easy to master. The Sounds are very realistic and really make you feel you are part of the action. The menus are just as easy as ever to navigated. The game is presented very professionally.

3.Gameplay - 9/10. Game is too easy on Hardened and too hard on veteran, the reason it is too hard on veteran is due to the fact you have to advance on your own if you want to porgress through a level. There are unlimited enemies if you stay back and shoot.

4.Replayability - 10/10. The online has once again taken over for this game once you complete the story mode. This game has years of replayability. The only game that will stop it is COD6!

10/10 - What a game!!! I'll say no more.


____________________________

Linkrules08
Chuck Norris's Son
Chuck Norris's Son

Number of posts: 3172
Age: 15
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Wii FC: 6832-1748-1366-9350
XBL Gamertag: iponemidgets42
Brawl FC: 3050-7260-4784
Epicness: 31
Registration date: 2008-01-27

Re: Call of Duty: World at War [Avg: 9.3]

Post  Linkrules08 on Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:32 pm

My Review:

Graphics: 9.0 -- They're pretty average to nice for the 360. Nothing really stuck out to me as stunning though.

Presentation: 9.6 -- The sound tracks on the menu and last level of campaign are excellent. Controls are the norm for a FPS game. Online is great but partying up can get annoying at times because it will boot you for no reason.

Gameplay: 9.2 -- Online flows smoothly but the campaign can be choppy and even glitchy at times. I had to play the one level in the sub several times before the cutscene that takes you into the next level activated.

Replayability: 10 -- As with every game that has good multiplayer, the replayability of it is amazing.

Average: 9.5 out of 10


____________________________



  • Post new topic
  • Reply to topic

Current date/time is Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:52 am