Rate Call Of Duty 4 here

Categories:

1.Graphics: How good are the Graphics, Be sure to consider all parts of the game

2.Presentation (Sound, Controls, and Online): How good do the menus look, and how good does the sound (Music and sound effects) and Controls immerse you in the game. How was the Online mode?

3.Gameplay: Is the game fun to play? Too Short? Too Easy?

4.Replayability: Is the game worth playing over and over again?

On a scale of 1-10 and average ur score out

1. 9 - They could be a bit better, but they are GREAT graphics
2. 8 - A bit dull, but gets the job done, better layed out then Halo
3. OMG x Infinity +1 - I can't get over the awesomeness of Cod4
4. 9 - It's the only 360 game I play really (other then Bad Company)

1.Graphics-9.2 The graphics are good with a good amount of detail

2.Presentation-9.4 The sounds are good along with the control scheme and great online

3.Gameplay-9.1 The game is fairly simple to play but very fun

4.Replayability-9.3 The multiplayer and gameplay make this game to play for quite a while

Average-9.3

KingOfKings wrote:Rate Call Of Duty 4 here

Categories:

1.Graphics: How good are the Graphics, Be sure to consider all parts of the game

2.Presentation (Sound, Controls, and Online): How good do the menus look, and how good does the sound (Music and sound effects) and Controls immerse you in the game. How was the Online mode?

3.Gameplay: Is the game fun to play? Too Short? Too Easy?

4.Replayability: Is the game worth playing over and over again?

On a scale of 1-10 and average ur score out

1st infantry.com WOOT

Graphics- This game looks really pretty when you start to play and it is, but the death animations kind of downgrade it. Also some effects like walking through water look fake.------- 8.5
Presentation- The sound in this game is incredible and immersive. They got the gun sounds right on and your teammates yelling makes you feel like your in a real war. The controls are spot on perfect and are easy to grasp. The online play is wonderful with many game modes and little lag.----------------10
Gameplay- The game is incredibly fun and the game is really challenging and your enemies are smart. The only drawback is that its short.-------------------------9.5
Replayability- The game is fun enough that you'll want to play through again and the online play will keep you going until cod:world at war comes out.------------10
It is a great game--------------- 9.5 out of 10

1.Graphics-8/10- They are not going to be the Benchmark for many other games. In other words they are poor for next Gen. The graphics in the first mission are brilliant but as soon as you enter the regular battlefied, they get very dull. Also if you look down while in a car or helicopter, you have no legs!

2.Presentation-8/10- For the single player missions the sound is good and so is the presentation, but I have seen a lot better. The controls however are simple and you can come back to this game after weeks of not playing and still be as good as ever.

3.Gameplay-9/10- The game is too short, but after that there are no complaints. It is a big step up from having to run around bunkers all day like in the previous games. Also the secret missions are very challenging which is good for veterans of the game.

4.Replayability-10/10- No contest, this is probably one of the most replayable games that you can buy today. The online mode is very addictive and clearing the single player missions on Veteran difficulty makes you act more tactically when you attack an enemy.

9/10: The first three parts may have been very low scores but the reason this still gets 9/10 id due to its massive replayability and online features. A must buy.

My Review:

Graphics: 9.0 -- As I said with World at War, average to good on the 360.

Presentation: 9.5 -- Menus are smooth, music is decent but not that special, partying up is easier than in World at War.

Gameplay: 9.5 -- Campaign is smooth and well written, the multiplayer is excellent if it wasn't for the widespread glitching (which is a serious problem).

Replayability: 10 -- Great multiplayer will have you playing for a long time to come if this is your only Call of Duty game.

Average: 9.5 out of 10

Call of Duty 4=Call of Duty: World at War IMO

Linkrules08 wrote:My Review:

Graphics: 9.0 -- As I said with World at War, average to good on the 360.

Presentation: 9.5 -- Menus are smooth, music is decent but not that special, partying up is easier than in World at War.

Gameplay: 9.5 -- Campaign is smooth and well written, the multiplayer is excellent if it wasn't for the widespread glitching (which is a serious problem).

Replayability: 10 -- Great multiplayer will have you playing for a long time to come if this is your only Call of Duty game.

Average: 9.5 out of 10

Call of Duty 4=Call of Duty: World at War IMO

dude you should have done it on the 4th.stale trying to revive a review thread

koluigi wrote:

Linkrules08 wrote:My Review:

Graphics: 9.0 -- As I said with World at War, average to good on the 360.

Presentation: 9.5 -- Menus are smooth, music is decent but not that special, partying up is easier than in World at War.

Gameplay: 9.5 -- Campaign is smooth and well written, the multiplayer is excellent if it wasn't for the widespread glitching (which is a serious problem).

Replayability: 10 -- Great multiplayer will have you playing for a long time to come if this is your only Call of Duty game.

Average: 9.5 out of 10

Call of Duty 4=Call of Duty: World at War IMO

dude you should have done it on the 4th.stale trying to revive a review thread

Not really, I borrowed the game until today and I'm giving it back so I decided to review it.